Why is it those who don't do well, and then gradually do well, get an award while those who constantly do well, don't get a reward?
After all, if you're at the top, you try your utmost best to stay at the top. Wouldn't that be an achievement in itself too?
If one is daring, and has always been daring, how much more daring can he be since he is already daring?
Wouldn't he that is not daring but is becoming daring stand a better chance at winning the prize?
Or perhaps he that is daring should continue being daring, and then, in other fields, that he is weak in, boost it up a little, and reach for the reward in that field?
hmm. What do You think?
